|
NWHS
#006
June 19,
2006
Dear NWHS Supporter,
Welcome to issue #006 of the NWHS E-Newsletter. We thank
all subscribers for allowing us into your email
inbox. Please forward this email. If you enjoy this
newsletter, please invite others to sign up.
You may visit the National Wildlife Humane Society's
website at: http://www.humanewildlife.org
More NWHS news can be viewed on our site at:
If you would like to
receive this Newsletter and are not subscribed, just let us
know at info@humanewildlife.org. Please feel free to forward this Newsletter to
others you feel might be interested.
Please refrain from replying directly
back to us from this Newsletter. If you wish to email us,
concerning this Newsletter, or any other matter, please do so
at:
If you see a current and interesting
wildlife story, feel free to send us a link (to the info@
email address) to share with the other
subscribers.
Feds Propose Habitat for Puget Sound
Orcas June 2006 - By Gene
Johnson, Associated Press
SEATTLE - Federal
officials have proposed designating nearly all of northwest
Washington's inland waters -- about 2,500 square
miles -- as critical habitat for killer whales, the first
major development since the creatures were listed as
endangered last year.
Following a public comment
period, the habitat designation could become official by the
end of the year, the National Marine Fisheries Service said
Friday in a news release. It would mean that within the
outlined area, no federal activities can take place unless
officials demonstrate that the habitat will not be harmed.
The proposed area encompasses parts of Haro Strait,
the waters around the San Juan Islands, the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and all of Puget Sound except for Hood Canal, because
there is little evidence the orcas swim there. Eighteen
military sites covering nearly 112 square miles of habitat are
exempt.
"It looks like we're getting the tools in
place to provide orcas with the protection that hopefully will
get them to the point of recovery," said Patti Goldman, an
attorney with the environmental law firm Earthjustice.
But Kathy Fletcher, executive director of People for
Puget Sound, and Fred Felleman, of Ocean Advocates, questioned
whether the proposed area is enough: Besides military areas,
it excludes any waters less than 20 feet deep. They said
shorelines are crucial to the health of the ecosystem overall,
and in particular to salmon -- the primary food source of
Puget Sound's orcas. Herring, which the salmon eat, live in
shallow subtidal zones.
"This is a major gap,"
Fletcher said. "When something is proposed that might screw up
the habitat of Puget Sound" -- a dock for a construction
project, for instance -- "it's on the shoreline. The habitat
of the salmon is as important as the waters where the orcas
actually swim themselves."
Felleman said that overall,
he was pleased with the proposal, but that he would like to
see the waters off the state's western coast designated as
critical habitat as well: That's where the orcas spend at
least some of the winter, he said, and it's also where they
could be troubled by Navy activities.
Fisheries
Service spokesman Brian Gorman invited Fletcher and Felleman
to raise such points during the public comment period.
"People are encouraged to point out where they think
we need a little more work," he said.
The federal
agency's 44-page report on the proposal notes that the
designation of critical habitat could lead to revised limits
for commercial salmon fishermen and new standards for sewer
and stormwater discharge.
The "southern resident"
population of orcas in Puget Sound -- believed to have
numbered 140 or more in the last century -- has suffered
several major periods of decline since the 1960s, when the
whales were caught for aquariums. The population rebounded to
97 in the 1990s, then declined to 79 in 2001. Currently, there
are 90 whales, with several calves recently born.
Pollution and a decline in prey are believed to be
their biggest threats, though stress from whale-watch boats
and underwater sonar tests by the Navy are also concerns.
The National Marine Fisheries Service initially
refused to list the whales under the Endangered Species Act,
finding that they were not distinct from other orcas around
the world -- a finding based on a classification of the
species written in 1758. In 2002, eight environmental groups
sued, and U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ordered the agency
to reconsider, using updated science.
The fisheries
service eventually agreed that the Puget Sound orcas needed
protection, leading to the listing in November. Farm and
property rights groups have challenged the listing in federal
court in Seattle, saying it could lead to "needless water and
land-use restrictions on Washington farms, especially those
located near rivers inhabited by salmon," the orcas' prime
food source.
The fisheries service also said it
expects to release its draft orca recovery plan for public
comment within the next month.
Source: Associated
Press
Chemicals Harming Polar Bears,
Belugas, Seals June 2006 - By
Reuters
GENEVA - Toxic
chemicals are harming Arctic animals including polar bears,
beluga whales, seals and seabirds, the environmental group WWF
said on Thursday.
It said pollutants such as flame
retardants, pesticides and fluorinated chemicals made Arctic
wildlife vulnerable to health problems including immune
suppression and hormone disturbances.
"We can no
longer ignore the proof that chemicals are damaging the health
of wild animals," said Samantha Smith, director of the
Swiss-based group's international arctic programme.
The WWF, formerly known as the World Wildlife Fund,
said the chemical contamination of the Arctic threatened the
survival of many of the region's animal species, who also
faced possible habitat and food supply loss due to climate
change.
It appealed for "urgent and significant
strengthening" of European Union legislation designed to
protect people and the environment from the adverse effects of
chemicals found in products like paint, detergents, cars and
computers.
The bill, known by the acronym REACH, has
drawn criticism from the United States and other countries who
say its provisions could hurt trade and be hard to implement.
Among health effects, the WWF said the immune systems
of polar bears had been disrupted and there were signs of
weaker bone growth. Bears in the Barents Sea with high levels
of toxic PCBs suffered disruptions to thyroid hormones.
"The bodies of some belugas from the St. Lawrence
estuary in Canada are so contaminated that their carcasses are
treated as toxic waste," it said, adding that chemicals such
as flame retardants were compounding problems caused by older
pollutants.
The WWF said its report focused on
documented health problems in Arctic creatures, building on a
report in February highlighting the high levels of pollutants
in the Arctic.
The Arctic is far from industrial
centres but many long-lasting chemicals get swept north by
winds and ocean currents and build to damaging levels in fatty
tissues of creatures in the region.
Source:
Reuters
NWHS Headquarters Office Building
Update
We have obtained two
windfalls on obtaining this little cabin for our national
headquarter's office. The first being a very nice donation
from a friend out west (thanks Liz, we love you). The second
being, running into a builder who is going to construct this
building for us, with no re-seller "in the middle". We are
getting it manufacture direct. It has double wall construction
on the outside, and the ceiling is a full one foot taller. It
is also $1100 less in cost. We ran into the builder as a
fluke, and seemed almost like fate. Needless to say, we are
delighted. We have ordered it, and it's due to be delivered
next week. They are buildling it now.
Many thanks to others
who have assisted (thanks Dave and Heather). We are almost to
the the mark, where there will be NO monthly payments. That is
totally excellent, as that means there will be no monthly
burdens on the NWHS budget. We are still scrapping for some
funds to purchase Romex wiring, socket boxes, paneling,
fasteners and paint.
If our luck holds out,
maybe we can run into someone with an old window air
conditioner, as Arkansas summers can be blistering hot. We are
actually looking for a window unit that can heat and cool (but
will take whatever we can get). A ceiling fan will do, if
there is no AC forthcoming this year. :)
If anyone would care to
assist, please feel free to click the link below. If you're
unable to assist, we totally understand, as these are tough
times for all.
Click To See How To
Help |
If you no longer wish to receive our NWHS Newsletter,
just email
us and ask to be removed. Make certain to specify the
email address you wish to be removed from the subscription
list, if different from the email used to write us.
Articles not under the National Wildlife Humane Society (NWHS) by-line, do
not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of NWHS.
Articles not origintating from NWHS, are passed onto
interested recipients as is, and uneditied.
Privacy Policy: Your name, email address, or
any other private info will never be sold, traded, or
furnished to any other parties. Your privacy is assured, and
all info is stored offline. All subscribers' addresses are
hidden from all other subscribers and sent as "blind copies"
(BCC:).
| | |